Carps Veteran Location: Caterham, Surrey, England
| 1/ Can't answer as I have never had a Vigor CS, but the tail seems pretty good to me. I have owned the Sceadu, Voyager 50IMZ, and the Robbe Futura Nova, and it is certainly no worse than any of these. I too use the 601.
2/ Never had a boom strike on my 3DNT
3/ Apparantly they lean the other way - ie, right hand rotation leans to the right in a static hover, left hand rotation leans to the left. Obviously with the blades spinning the other way the heli is going to be more keen to turn in the opposite direction, and will perform rolls/flips/piros easier that way too.
4/ If you go with left hand rotation, the only sticking point will be the crank, and the head won't be correct for the cooling shroud. However, you can now order a C-Spec HGL which will sort out those problems
5/ The Classic was produced to help out people who couldn't orient on the proper 3DNT. It is a little more rigid in the frames too, and theoretically the tail should also be more rigid. Almost all parts except the frames, canopy, and skids are identical to the 3DNT.
6/ I don't think there is much in it.
7/ No. The biggest problem with the NT control system is that if you have a heavy auto there is a lot of weight and momentum in the flybar assembly and with plastic geared servos you may well find them stripping more often than normal. I use 9206 in one NT and have replaced gearsets on the swashplate servos twice. I use 9350 in the other and, fingers crossed, have not replaced any yet.
8/ No.
9/ The only part I have had to replace due to wear so far are the two bearings that stop the belt skipping off the tail pulley. I believe this was my fault too as they aren't supposed to touch the belt normally, but I think mine may have been.
Good luck |