docramage Heliman Location: Warlingham, Surrey, UK
| Excellent explanation Augusto.
I too have had trouble with WWBs. In the Raptor the bearing is integral with the clutch, and following your explanation I suspect it's failure to centre when there is minor mis-alignment of the engine/clutch/start shaft that causes the problem.
(I think the correspondent who suggested greasing the inside of the bearing was probably rightly offering a simple solution - surely a thick grease would at least encourage all the rollers to engage)
My 2ry old Freya has a Torrington bearing as the input for the starter wand - a 6mm hardened shaft. I feel this is wrong - a bearing with rollers instead of balls fails to work like a constant-velocity joint, and it is almost inevitable that there will be mis-alignment with a hand-held start wand.
Nevertheless, I've replaced the Torrington with a hex, and use a standard hex wand without an integral one-way bearing. This is better in some ways, in that a ball-ended hex does (almost) act as a CVJ, so alignment is not a problem. However it does mean of course that the shaft is rotating when it is pulled, and it tends to get thrown...(which is OK as long as it doesn't hit the throttle/collective stick)
What I want to make is a start wand with a ball-ended hex, but that has a one-way bearing close to the ball. This way one could have a "freewheel" function, but there would only be a few grams of mass to withdraw on the engine firing. It somehow seems more of an engineer's solution to have the one-way mechanism where you can see and service it, rather than expending fuel carrying it as cargo.
Brilliant diagrams!
Incidentally - can you tell me :
With any kind of one-way bearing, if you suddenly accelerate the input shaft to catch up with an already-rotating output, does this place any more stress on the bearing? Engagement surely can't take place until both shafts are at (almost) identical speeds. I'm thinking of the situation where you have landed briefly, throttle at idle and the rotor rpm is still high-ish, and you then kick in throttle to take off again. Thirty years ago I drove a 1947 Rover with a freewheel function, and it didn't seem to harm that. If it is harmful, shouldn't our start motors have a "softstart" ?
Philip |