FlightPower Veteran Location: Herts UK
| It looks to me like the quality of that house photo is close to the theoretical limit for that camera. Excellent job!
re: "A little heavy but it seems to be plenty strong" - I wouldn't go out of my way to change that, it looks like you have a good bit of "sprung" weight to drive the isolators properly and no opportunity for flex or slop to creep in which can plague thinner materials. I really like the way that you have two distinct stages of isolation - the big boys at the top driven by the weight of the skids and the Lord mounts (or equivalent) driven by primarily by the weight of the camera mount which I guess is heavier than the camea. Another cool thing, I don't know if you noticed, the Lord mounts (or equivalent) are most flexible in torsion then shear and then vertical load in that order. Now the rotors deliver unwanted motion (in a hover) like a wobbling plate spinning on a pole, i.e. the worst stuff comes in from the sides, which is a perfect match for your countermeasures. It's a little different when the heli is in forward flight, you end up with figures of 8 and gross acceleration forces, but that's another story which is of little relevance to stills.
Nicely done, and no bank-breaker either, congratulations,
Julian |