ININVERNO
Heliman
Location: San Leandro - Ca
| Hi Steve, I am so glad that you agree my suggest to switch in the future in the SA frame, like i explained many time with SA frame we can get better balancing , baric enter and also we can use many different battery pack form 4s to 6s.
About the 150 T I thinks can a good option but I am worry about the O. Diameter, I do not know how fit in, also the motor need moved to much in the front, than the baric enter will be displaced too much.
My proposition about 100T was calculated to fit into the actual SA frame but with 2 great positive point 1) bigger rapport / more pinion option 2) more T in contact / stronger transmission.
My suggest is to realize a CNC High Module Resistance Delrin main gear like micro Hely makes for the 94T. In addition, I advise you to make the new main gear with 1 mm more thickens than can use all pinion thief surface.
One other suggests.
Yesterday I tested and compare the SE tail fin, versus the SA in the end I can assure you that in retrograde fly Hely is more precise with the SA.
I guess that the motivation is for the different angle, the SE version go too much in the backside and make noise, the SA is vertical and the Hely is perfect.
In addition, the length of the SE version is not adequate with the 68 or 70 mm tail blade necessary for a 3D fly.
As you can see in my landing gear attachment, I add a 5 mm spacer in the rear attachment, this make higher tail and perfect setting to use the 68 mm blade and the SA fin.
Yesterday I was in fast 3d maneuver and I lost one tail blade (this was my fault because I bended in the car and I try to use!!!) I was so proud because the Hely start spinning like a creasy but with hold switch and autorotation the 500 landed immaculate!!!!
TTYL Luca Invernizzi |
