firefox Senior Heliman Location: Thailand
| This is really what this thread is all about. People become experts on bashing various products even though they've never owned the product. And by "bashing", I refer to listing out all the negative (and yes, only the negative) aspects of a product and exaggerating said aspects as much as possible. Not much can come out of this, except for a lot of hatred, and it's really sad that people who used to contribute "sanely" to threads have dropped to this level.
Bottom line is yes, the Trex 600N is better, technically, than the Raptor. It's 10 frickin years newer without the need to think about old stocked parts, of course it's better. It doesn't mean that the Raptor flies like a dog, it just means that it can't match the T-rex, stock for stock. Can you enjoy flying either? Yes. Which would you prefer to crash? Depends. Which would you prefer to buy? Again, depends. Is the Trex 600N a perfect gift of god, worth of adoration and free from sin? In your dreams. No helicopter is perfect.
Enjoy whatever helicopter you have. You don't need to try to increase your manlihood by bashing other supposedly inferior products. Or do you? |