RonHill Veteran Location: ..
| | Quote |
| You had better take a closer look at the video posted here of a pro that lost control of the heli
|
Not really...You answer your own question with your next sentance IMO
"He himself felt awkward flying too close "
That says it all IMO. Then he should have made a change before he flew. In skydiving I have what is called a PRO rating. It allows me to be one of those guys that jump into stadiums, do high profile demos...ect. I have canceled many demos since the conditions were not right, or I didn't like the setup. Some of these demos paid really well, but I didn't do them anyway. One demo I was in the Army and had to tell a Full Bird that my team was not going to jump...He was not happy, but thatswhat had to happen. If there was a dangerous situation; I fixed it, or didn't go.
Pros are often pressured to do things to "put on the show." Now thats not to say I have not jumped in questionable conditions...I have, just at local DZ's far removed from spectators, not at high profile events where others were at risk.
So, two questions: 1. If the pilot and heli had been 20 feet further out....Would his flight have been less cool, or required less skill?
2. If the PILOT thinks things are two close, who are we to disagree with him?
My point is that it seems he would have liked to have been further out...Except WE pressured them to do it close.
Let me be the first to say that I am as impressed as a funnel at 10 feet as I am at 2. And as impressed when it is 30 feet away as in my face.
As for the media and being close....Yes, they accept a higher risk. But Telephoto lenses allow people to get pics from safe areas...Think those closeups of lions were done from 5 feet away? 
Was the other guy hit last week media?
More info on the PRO rating http://www.uspa.org/licenses/demo.htm |