rrTV-PHOTO   New HD TV
HOME   rrTV-PHOTO   GALLERIES   MY GALLERY   HELP-FAQ
myHOME PM pmRR MEMBERS 714 ONLINE 69 EVENTS SEARCH REGISTER  START HERE
 
1 page979 viewsPOST REPLY
Century Helicopter . MTA Hobbies . MRC/Altech Marketing USA

.
.
HIROBO X-spec - Freya - Sceadu - Shuttle > Evo 50 vs. Evo 90
 
 
keqwow
Senior Heliman
Location: Ithaca, N.Y.

For those of you who have both, or have flown both....just how much alike are they? Are there significant differences in the flight performances between the two....responsiveness, smoothness of flight, 3d characteristics??
03-15-2006 Over year old.
 
 
BarracudaHockey
rrMaster
Location: Orange Park FL

The 90 is smoother and autos much better.

For the cost and fuel I'll stick with the 50 but if I had the money I'd get a 90.


AMA 77227
http://www.jaxrc.com
03-15-2006 Over year old.
 
 
ncarbon
Senior Heliman
Location: Kalispell Montana

The 90 is a lot easier to see as well. I had a Sceadu 50 and I really liked that bird, the 90 is very similar, flys much nicer in wind and is a joy to all around. It does drink fuel though...
03-15-2006 Over year old.
 
 
WreckRman2
Key Veteran
Location: Indianapolis, IN

Amazingly they fly very similar except that the 90 is bigger, more stable, more smooth and much more powerful.

On my first flights of the 90 it seemed just like my 50 size but when you start banging on it the true meaning of a 90 really shows.

________________
David Smith
317.777.3230
Hirobo Evolution 50, Thunder Tiger 53
03-15-2006 Over year old.
 
 
1 page979 viewsPOST REPLY
Next D . Futaba-RC . Fast Lad Performance

.
.
HIROBO X-spec - Freya - Sceadu - Shuttle > Evo 50 vs. Evo 90
  UPDATE SCREEN   PRINT TOPIC Advertisers 

Subscribe to This Topic

Monday, May 12 - 2:00 pm - Copyright © 2000 - 2008 runryder.com | email | link to rr | runryder needs cookie