rrTV-PHOTO   New HD TV
HOME   rrTV-PHOTO   GALLERIES   MY GALLERY   HELP-FAQ
myHOME PM pmRR MEMBERS 478 ONLINE 44 EVENTS SEARCH REGISTER  START HERE
 
1 page2584 viewsPOST REPLY
Fast Lad Performance . Ace Hobby . Esprit Model

.
.
Aerobatic 3D Contest > Just a Thought
 
 
Augusto
rrAdvertiser
Location: San Diego, CA

I like reading the Model Helicopter World Magazine's aerobatic maneuvers column. I find it pretty interesting and I think having an "Aerobatics Forum" it would be a nice addition to this site.

It would be a place to ask about techniques used to achieve difficult maneuvers.

Just a thought

Avant Aurora Ultimate
12-19-2001 Over year old.
 
 
DrScoles
Veteran
Location: Redmond WA

Augusto,

What I would like to see is a US heli magazine of the same caliber as mhw. Rotary just seems like a big advertisement. and mht doesn't seem to come out enough.

In the scuba diving magazines, there are only a few that give honest reviews, the rest suck up to the equipment manufacturers and resort owners...

We need a true US heli magazine, I'm sure there are enough people out there to write it, just don't think it would be very profitable Are we that small of a group??

Mike
12-19-2001 Over year old.
 
 
Blair
Key Veteran
Location: Republic of Canuckistan

MHT

MHT is a great US mag. Unfortunately it needs more writers and a editor with more time.

Unless someone is willing to step up to the plate it will be gone very soon.

Why reinvent the wheel?

Blair
12-19-2001 Over year old.
 
 
Buzzin Brian
Elite Veteran
Location: College Station, Texas

I know the owner of MHT. And from what I have been hearing around the field, Mike has sold the mag. So there could be some changes in the furture. Not sure about that, but we will see.
12-19-2001 Over year old.
 
 
- Location: -
New Forum suggestions

Its a great Idea!!

Just make sure to add a few other forums

The Hovergod Forum (Place where all the forum Curtis wanabee's can hang out) probably clean the rest of the forums out.

The Ego Boost forum (Place where everyone can list all there equipment and make them self feel like there hung more than a new born)

The Photo Forum (Place where one can make them self feel like a true hover puss by posting multiple pictures of the same thing or in some case's pictures of other's helicopter in place of there own when one cant attempt a maneuver.)

The Forum God Forum (Place where mostly the hovergod's will hang out. Basically the forum god is a person who in real life might be able to hover or at best achieve forward flight only when the wind direction shifts unexpectedly. Is generally seen giving out advice left and right but has no direct knowledge of the advice being given out.)

It of course could go one but then again I would rather be flying than sitting at a computer.
12-19-2001 Over year old.
  WV   EDIT
 
 
nutswinger
Senior Heliman
Location: TX

now that is some good humor
keep it up siko
12-19-2001 Over year old.
 
 
RappyTappy
Elite Veteran
Location: Las Vegas, NV

siko3D, there are 24 hours in a day. Plenty of time to post and fly in the same day.

Chris
Rex 500
Burning them electrons :D

Forever Brothers
Mickey Tylo
12-19-2001 Over year old.
HOMEPAGE  
 
 
Steve Campbell
Elite Veteran
Location: Baton Rouge, LA

<<...I just don't think it would be very profitable...>>

And there you have it; the reason why MHT has foundered, and why there will probably never be another mag like it.

Most of you have no clue just how much work is involved in producing a quality publication I know I certainly didn't, until I got involved with it. Never mind content; just getting the thing laid out and printed is a major ordeal.

The key to profits is advertising dollars. Subscription and newsstand sales won't pay the bills, let alone make a profit. MHT built it's reputation on telling it like it is; if a product was crap, we told you so, and why. needless to say, this is not exactly the attitude the big manufacturers/distributors are looking for.

Ray produced MHT basically single-handedly for four years. Then, a fluctuauting economy forced a career change on him, and he just didn't have the time any more. Mike was fed up with HIS job at Dell, and saw MHT as a way to make a living and have fun too. After several years of busting his butt just to make ends meet (hopefully), he's had enough.

It's the price to be paid for maintaining integrity and not becoming a whore for the manufacturers/distributors. Gordon Banks manages to maintain a certain level of honesty with R/C Report; but it took him years to get where he is, circulation-wise. He is a retired military guy, and didn't depend on his magazine to put food on the table.

If someone has the time, resources (dollars), and circumspection (i.e., knowing what to publish and how to manage content), they could take MHT and make it into a very viable publication again. I'd like to see it, and am proud to have made a small contribution in it's early years. But the time goblin got me too...

Anyway, I intend to call Mike tomorrow and find out what the skinny is.

Steve
12-19-2001 Over year old.
 
 
ed vega
Key Veteran
Location: nyc, queens

agree'd, we need something on a consistant basis for the flyers . but a manuver is a manuver, fai schedules and other schedules are there . if we could have some one interpret the sequence setup this would be cool too , 3d could be alittle harder to explain for most ..

another thing I've been looking at this mag - R/C technique - japans modelers bible comes out every month has these pullouts, blueprints, techniques on manuvers heli's and airplane, and others ..

I used to subscribe to it at $100 year .. I think the price went up some .. but it's availiable .. has the latest and greatest of r/c and heli's . only problem is it's in japanese .. more of a visual reference easy to follow ..

http://www.rc-tech.co.jp/index.html
12-19-2001 Over year old.
 
 
Mike99
Veteran
Location: Canal Winchester, OH

All the communication mediums are changing so fast we are looking for a mid point between the Great Magazine,,, and the Over Flooded Bullitin Board. This site has taken the place of a monthly mag for me. The only problem is I have to "ask" the right questions, and sometimes I don't know what they are. A Mag brings up new ideas that we never thought of and sparks new interests, challenges etc. Here we get to "see it all" if we just look, but included in your search is some stuff you would rather not spend your time reading (I write some of that drivel too). Alternate forums can be short lived, but I think one devoted to aerobatic manuevers is a good idea. I am a "newbie" and have only two other heli pilots at the local club. (I am lucky, one is a 20 year vet Ron Kumers) Most of the elements I learn come from watching Ron, trying them on the sim, then off to the field. I would like to see a list of manuevers, rated to skill level, showing a progression from novice up.
Just my 2 cents

Mike99
12-19-2001 Over year old.
HOMEPAGE  
 
 
RappyTappy
Elite Veteran
Location: Las Vegas, NV

Go to www.IRCHA.org and check out the PPP Levels(Pilot Proficency Program). It has levels 1 thru 7. It gives descriptions of manuevers in each level getting increasingly more advanced the higher the level you go. Level 7 guys are the pros.

Chris
Rex 500
Burning them electrons :D

Forever Brothers
Mickey Tylo
12-19-2001 Over year old.
HOMEPAGE  
 
 
Augusto
rrAdvertiser
Location: San Diego, CA

What I mean is not a forum to just list and describe what a maneuver looks like. What I mean is one to discuss the tricks to get them right.

Look at this post from RCOnline. In it there were several posts as to how each one was able to achieve a tornado or funnel:

============================================

YSRRider
HOW TO DO A TORNADO????????? Posted 12-18-2001 03:36

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
whats the secret to this maneuver??? i have tried to pull it off on RF but it doesnt look to good! usually ends up in a crash! im thinking this needs to be done under negative pitch?


misskimo
hi Posted 12-18-2001 09:14

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
yes , - pitch is right , and Im thinking you have to say on that tail too , and you control the up and down with the collective, so upside down in a hover , tilt the nose up at about 65 degrees and kinda going side ways to help the transsion , and jump on the tail alittle when you throw in right ail or left , which ever you are comfortable with and let her rip . sounds easy huh? but I never tried it before , just on the sim. Tony



raptor30
How to do a tornado??? Posted 12-18-2001 16:03

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The way i start a tornado/funnel is:

From forwardflight,pull up like entering a stall turn,but when the heli stops,give full negative and full right(or left)aileron.
Watch the tail and if you wanna climb you have to give backwards cyclic!

On the sim i can do it for as long as i want but in real i cant hold it long because the lack of power :-(

Max



Countach
Tornados Posted 12-18-2001 23:19

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you enter a funnel from backwards flight you will not load the engine as much and will be much easier to control.



DrScoles
funnel Posted 12-19-2001 00:14

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think its good to master backwards inverted first. This enables you to enter and exit the maneuver in a very controlled manner. To start, you can be flying backwards inverted and just start making a tighter and tighter circle. A lot of times when you're learning how to do this, you end up with a big circle with the tail pointed down and teh skids facing in.
Someone else above mentioned having the power to do the trick. You can do a flatter or more open funnel with average power, however, to do an almost vertical funnel, it really takes a lot of juice. This is the only trick that kind of slows down my OS91. When I get it almost straight up and start to climb, the motor is really working hard.

I'm working on popping a balloon on the ground with either a pin on the end of the tailfin, or the tail blades themselves... and while night flying, you could put the cyalume stuff in the balloon before you blow it up.

Wind is another challenge with this trick. On a calm day, its a piece of cake to keep it right in front of you, but when its windy, you have to time the collective with the wind and that is a few too many things for my brain to handle all at once.

I just wish it would stop raining!!!!! Coming from San Diego to 9 months of rain is killing me!

Mike


ColeopTer
The trick Posted 12-19-2001 03:50

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Even if you're not that proficient on inverted tail first flight there is an easy trick to do a tornado and you can try it in your sim to see how easy it is.

1) From a fast forward flight pull up on the elevator and let the helicopter go straight up until it loses almost all forward speed.

2) Give full left aileron so the helicopter is rolling with the rolling axis aligned vertically.

3) At this point slowly add a LITTLE BIT of left rudder and I really mean SLOWLY. The helicopter will be doing sort of a funnel but the rotation center will be the middle of the helicopter. By now the helicopter should be starting to fall.

4) At this point start giving it negative pitch until you stop the helicopter from falling.

There are basically two things that modify the shape of the tornado.

For smaller diameter tornados:
Increasing the left rudder makes it more flat and therefore you need to lower the negative pitch to compensate and prevent it from climbing. It also makes the diameter of the tornado smaller. You can take it up to the point where the rotation center is the tail and it looks like the tail is stationary.

Bigger Tornados:
If you increase the negative pitch then you need to ease up on the rudder otherwise it will climb. At the same time the size of the torado is bigger. This is where even a 91 starts to feel forced.

The smaller one is easier on the engine.

There's also a trick I use to compensate for wind and also to correct for the funnel to be perfectly vertical.

When you see the tornado tilting to a certain side you will notice that one side of the tornado becomes more "vertical" while the opossite side becomes more tilted down. The trick is to wait until it's in the "vertical" position and give it a little momentary up elevator. You can repeat over and over for anytime the helicopter passes by the "vertical" side of the tornado. Doing this will keep the tornado pretty much perfectly aligned.

Hope this helps and let me know if it worked for you.


============================================



I know I have a gazillion things to ask about how to achieve this or that maneuver or compensate for this or that. That's the kind of stuff I'm referring to not just a description of what it should look like.

Avant Aurora Ultimate
12-19-2001 Over year old.
 
 
nutswinger
Senior Heliman
Location: TX

this has got to be the funniest post i have seen on this site coleo.
as much as yall complane about RCO, and then to show an example of what ya want , what do ya do?
post an entire thread from over there. a thread where most, if not all, of the posters are also on this forum too
just goes ta show, most anything ya can ask, has already been answered, over there
12-20-2001 Over year old.
 
 
RappyTappy
Elite Veteran
Location: Las Vegas, NV

Here we go

*yawn*

Chris
Rex 500
Burning them electrons :D

Forever Brothers
Mickey Tylo
12-20-2001 Over year old.
HOMEPAGE  
 
 
Augusto
rrAdvertiser
Location: San Diego, CA

Quote 
Originally posted by nutswinger
as much as yall complane about RCO, and then to show an example of what ya want , what do ya do?
post an entire thread from over there. a thread where most, if not all, of the posters are also on this forum too
just goes ta show, most anything ya can ask, has already been answered, over there



Nuts,

I don't know why you say we all complain. I certainly don't complain about RCO. I only have said it's painfully slow which is just a statement of facts other than that I find RCO pretty useful too. I posted that request due to several reasons:

1) This is a helicopter-only dedicated website therefore we heli pilots like the fact that we are not one more in a few dozen forums and our requests and comments are met with more interest. I know asking for a new forum in RCO will fall on deaf ears. I think that having different interest forums gives a more rich and organized content to the site. Going to a certain forum an reading all the posts allows you to read mostly about a certain subject you're interested on.

2) Looking at all what's happening with the dot-coms lately I am afraid we are going to wake up one day only to find out that "everyone.net" has gone belly up and there goes all our information. Having two places with information is better than one. I don't see why there is a need to say this one is great and the other one sucks. I really believe from an information point of view both are pretty good.

3) I used to be a more frequent contributor to RCO and as you can see in the post I myself STILL contribute to the RCO content. It's only that lately I find RCO so slow that it takes so long to go read each post that I just get tired and give up. Slow and everything RCO's content is relevant and pretty good.

Addressing the underlying premise in your post I think I would like to express my opinion regarding this forum competition/comparison issue.
I find that sometimes some of the contributors of this forum are a bit on the fanatic side. Take for instance siko3d's "I have to ask" post. In that post he commented about four things he was perceiving as this forum going in the direction of RCO.

He talked about:
a) Delettion of posts without leaving a trace.
b) Donations issue
c) Prohibition to use active links
d) Slowing down lately.

In my view having concerns about all those issues at the time he posted it was a valid point. I myself sent an e-mail to Mark Ryder voicing my oposition to the active links prohibition. He explained to me what his reasons were and I understand and respect his opinion but we have diferent points of view about it. Nevertheless he is footing the bills for this forum and therefore he has every right to make policy and all my gratitude for making this resource available.

The "slowing down lately" was a temporary thing that got corrected but it was there for everyone to see and siko3d had a point asking about it. Regarding the donations most people got burned with the RCO donations issue and he was concerned whether something similar was happening here. In that case Ed Walker had dot-com dreams of getting funded by a venture capital firm which never happened and everybody's donations went to waste.

Mark's enforcement of the "No personal attacks" policy was perceived by him as a censorship issue. Even though it wasn't censorship he clearly perceived it a such and asked about it.

To sicko3D's post some responded pretty harshly and even wanted him booted out. I certainly don't agree with that reaction and to me it was like seeing a lynching mob.

I think everyone's point of view deserves respect and attention. I wholeheartedly agree with Mark's policy about not allowing "personal attacks". Now a disenting opinion is just that, somebody that sees it differently than yourself. Not everyone will agree with everything but we can still have a civilized discussion.

Going back to the original request I certainly still think that an aerobatics forum would be a good thing to have. In the meantime I'll just post my questions about aerobatics in the main forum.
But that'll have to wait until I come back from a few days of vacation I'm taking tomorrow

Avant Aurora Ultimate
12-20-2001 Over year old.
 
 
ed vega
Key Veteran
Location: nyc, queens

I'm very much interested in your idea about flying techniques but different machines require varying techniques dependng on your rotor setup , skill and it's responsiveness .. many aspects to this too .. for instance a rigid single spindled rotor will respond differently than a flapping hinge rotor .. blade weights, rotor rpm and the like for the same technique can vary .. how to compare?, things like this can be pointed out too or mapped out ..

a prequistite to a tornado / funnel is a consistant nose or tail in/out circle, upright or inverted , keeping the tail or nose always within the center of rotation .
12-20-2001 Over year old.
 
 
nutswinger
Senior Heliman
Location: TX

coleo,coleo.coleo:
dude
ya missed the point.
my only intent is to point out what i see as humor in all the crap i see flying around the inet.
and just maby to make light of how certainly seriousl alotta folks take things that really do not have a bit of importance in the real world.
does anything in any of these forums really affect the amount of food we can put on our tables?
12-20-2001 Over year old.
 
 
1 page2584 viewsPOST REPLY
Thunder Power RC . Real Raptors . Mikado Modellhubschrauber

.
.
Aerobatic 3D Contest > Just a Thought
  UPDATE SCREEN   PRINT TOPIC Advertisers 

Subscribe to This Topic

Saturday, July 19 - 6:05 am - Copyright © 2000 - 2008 runryder.com | email | link to rr | runryder needs cookie