Mopzilla Veteran Location: Cupertino, CA USA
| | Quote |
| It sounds fair that you pay for any damage you cause if you crash into someones plane. But, what about the guy that brings a turbine heli, or a $10,000.00 F-18. That person may be willing to risk that kind of money, but then should everyone at the field now be put in the position to pay for that heli/ plane should they accidentaly midair with it. Why should eveyone be forced to take that risk just because some wealthy man feels that money is no object?
|
Hold on, that's two different things. First, if I was in the shoes of the guy who owns the super expensive machine, I'd insure it, just in case something does go wrong. If you have 10,000 to dump on an r/c aircraft, you better have money to dump on the insurance for it. If there is a midair, then they should figure it out. But if something happens, like a fool is flying over the pits inverted and accidentally give up elevator and destroys the turbine jet/heli, then they should pay, at least some money. On the other hand, the guy with the expensive toy should have kept it in a protective frame or in a car. Who knows.
Accidents happen. And here is another standpoint: A guy with a super expensive model has it out where it can be hit. It is HIS responsibility to keep it safe - so don't show off and keep it in the car. It is HIS responsibility to insure it. HIS responsibility to go and clear the frequency so he doesn't get shot down. If he did everything right, with max caution and safety, and somebody else flew their plane into the pits or into somebody's trunk, then they should pay at least a large amount, even thought the persons model is insured. Insurance goes up when something happens... no?
----------------- Ever stop to think, and forget to start again? |