MinAirChris Heliman Location: Sunny Florida
| Mathematically, yes. The shorter boom will in effect reduce the available angular velocity in the yaw axis. However, in reality, there is so much there to start with, you couldn't possibly want or need as much as is available. I have seen XL's, old ones even, with the 31.5" booms that were set up for pirouette rates that were blinding. So fast I wondered why the battery didn't sling loose from the radio tray. Add to this the fact that the high head speed and consequently high tail speed give the Ion-X so much more tail than is usually available...I really can't imagine you would miss 1.5" off the end of the tail.
As for balancing of the yaw rates in either direction, this is just radio/linkage setup and I would think that even pulling one side back so that it matches the other, you would still have plenty. I could be wrong, there may be someone out there who likes a blury helicopter in full yaw...
All of my prototypes had 31.5" booms and they felt/flew fine. Many people flew them and I can't ever remember anyone telling me the tail felt underpowered or unbalanced FWIW....
Chris
Previously known as ChrisS |